This blog is part of The Aperiodical by Peter Rowlett, Katie Steckles and Christian Perfect. Find Features, News, Videos and other Columns, all aimed at a mathematical audience. If you like this blog, you should check out the rest.
I also write and edit blog posts at Second-Rate Minds for ACMEScience.com.
Math/Maths Podcast: Peter Rowlett in the UK talks to Samuel Hansen in the US about news & current affairs.
Travels in a Mathematical World Podcast: Mathematicians speaking about their work.
Find out about the Institute of Mathematics and its Applications (IMA).
I guest blog over at IMA maths blogger.
I am a member of the British Society for the History of Mathematics (BSHM).
About Peter Rowlett
I am interested in mathematics education & maths promotion.
More information on my website peterrowlett.net.
Well-read posts
-
Time and again, pure mathematics displays an astonishing quality. A piece of mathematics is developed (or discovered) by a mathematician who...
-
I consider popular mathematics writing to be a good thing. I even tried a little myself and would be keen to try more. I am not, however, a...
-
We were sent a link to a blog post by Katie Steckles for the Math/Maths Podcast a couple of weeks ago. I'm preparing...
-
...what do I like about this story? It too presents incorrect information about mathematics and the real world...
-
The title is silly, of course, but is meant to refer to a problem with historical accuracy. I have had this blog post in draft for a long time and I am struggling to finish it...
-
Google Books Ngram Viewer is a Google labs product for comparing terms in books between 1500 and 2008. The idea seems to be to track trends...
-
The IMA... are redeveloping their website and the redeveloped site will have a section "I Love Maths". The email asks for suggestions of content to link to...
-
This morning on Twitter Tony Mann asked the question: "This morning's class is "What is Mathematics?" Answers in a tweet please." Answers...
-
Today I spent an enjoyable time at Pi-hunting - the story of a mathematical obsession, run by...
-
When I started taking an interest in university mathematics teaching back in 2003/4, I quickly became aware...
-
Yesterday on Twitter I asked a question that had been asked of me: "Help: looking for web resources for 14 year old girl struggling with maths, particularly fractions, & maths confidence"...
-
I was asked a question from a keen 13 year old school student who has been playing around with Pythagorean triples. I asked Twitter for "inspiring reading"...
Most read last 30 days
-
85 by brighterorange Introduction Welcome to a new Carnival of Mathematics! Traditionally the Carnival opens with facts about the ...
-
I just published my second post over at Second-Rate Minds , the mathematical writing blog launched by Samuel Hansen and I back in August . T...
-
You may have noticed a new look here on Travels in a Mathematical World. For a while this blog was designed to look like a page from my webs...
-
...or is it just reflecting mine? Inspired by a suggestion on Twitter to ask Wolfram|Alpha " Are you Skynet? " I had a look around for ot...
-
Episode 5. The smallest number of queens needed to attack every square on a standard chess board is five. More facts about the number 5 at n...
Blog Archive
-
▼
2012
(36)
-
►
March
(9)
- Carnival of Mathematics in a Mathblogging.org worl...
- Behind closed doors: the Spanish intelligence serv...
- Reviving the Carnival of Mathematics
- Happy π day
- London Day Trip Stop 4: Sir John Soane's Museum
- Neil deGrasse Tyson: Culturally an academic
- IMA Bulletin Volume 1, Issue 1
- London Day Trip Stop 3: British Museum
- London Day Trip Stop 2: Russell Square
-
▼
February
(12)
- The months are drawing in
- London Day Trip Stop 1: British Library
- Stereotype-abiding mathematicians of the world, un...
- Picture this!, an interactive problem/puzzle
- Almost all above average
- Barriers to teaching
- Reading around the Alan Turing Pardon
- A puzzle from James Grime about abcdef
- Things to do in London on a Tuesday
- George and Julian
- Mathematicians are people too
- Why do we enjoy maths history misconceptions?
-
►
January
(10)
- Puzzle from Maths Jam Nottingham: Kathryn's cube o...
- Apparently Gauss got in this bar fight with Hilber...
- Puzzle from Maths Jam Nottingham: Jon's coloured b...
- Maths Jam Conference talk write-ups
- Favourite popular mathematics books
- E-Learning in Mathematical Subjects
- What is mathematics?
- Have you used maths in the news in school?
- Card trick video from Christian Perfect
- 300 posts later, who is Peter Rowlett?
-
►
March
(9)
Wednesday, 29 February 2012
The months are drawing in
Another way of looking at this is that February is about 93.5% the length of January, so I asked which would produce a shorter December:
A. losing a fixed 2 days each month; or,
B. each month being 93.5% of the previous.
It's possible, of course, to simply calculate the answer. However, it is possible to come to an answer as to which is shorter without recourse to such a messy technique.
Under B, we know 93.5% of January is two days, the amount by which February is shorter. If March is 93.5% of February we know this decrease must be less than two days because February was shorter than January. And so on. The decrease in A is always 2 days, but the decrease in B is 2 days in the first month and less for later months. Since the overall decrease has been greater, A gives a shorter December.
I suppose there's a niggle that we don't usually allow fractions of days on the calendar, so if you're going to be all 'real world' about it then each month should be rounded and this rounding will occur before the 93.5% is calculated to form the next month. So I suppose we will have to do a messy calculation after all.
Under A, losing 2 days per month for 11 months is 22 days, so December will be 9 days long.
Under B, taking each month to be 93.5% of the previous, and then rounding to the nearest integer in the normal way, I get a sequence for the number of days for each month: 31, 29, 27, 25, 23, 22, 21, 20, 19, 18, 17, 16.
So my December is a full seven days shorter by the 'fixed two days' method.
Did you get 14 or 15 days for December? If you simply take each month to be 93.5% of the previous without rounding, you calculate 0.935^11*31 and get December as 14.8 days. You can round this to 15, or take the whole days to get 14, but this requires nonsensical things like 18.5 days in November to have happened on the way.
I feel as though this could be a nice, silly way in at various levels to either some basic arithmetic, exponential decrease, through to boundedness in geometric sequences. Even, into some discussion about translating mathematics to real world answers, as the quick 0.935^11*31 calculation masks a whole mess of unreality along the way.


0 comments:
Post a Comment